Florida Keys News - Key West Citizen
Thursday, April 23, 2009Add to FacebookAdd to Twitter
Oil drilling vote shocks opponents

A Florida House committee on Tuesday passed a plan to allow oil drilling off Florida, despite concerns from environmentalists about its potential dangers.

Supporters claim the state could reap at least $31 billion in tax revenue over the next 20 years if oil production were developed. Opponents say that pales in comparison to the $562 billion a year the state's beaches, coral reefs and coastal waters generate, according to the Florida Oceans and Coastal Council.

Environmentalists and tourism industry officials have long fought offshore drilling, saying the revenue is not worth the potential losses if spills wreck local beaches and destroy the Florida Keys' fragile coral reefs.

"I can't believe it," said Billy Causey, the National Marine Sanctuary Program regional manager and former Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary superintendent. "Any short-term benefit would not be worth the long-term risks. If there was a spill, you would never make that revenue back. Can we really risk losing $562 billion a year?"

The Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico and other waterways support 5.8 million jobs and account for 79 percent of the state's economy, The ocean, reefs and backcountry waters off the Keys generate $1.2 billion a year through fishing, diving, and restaurant and hotel business, Causey said.

While drilling in the sanctuary will never happen, drilling in the Gulf of Mexico could have disastrous effects on the Keys, critics said. The Loop Current, which brings gulf waters into the Keys, could also bring oil and oil slicks in the event of an accident.

"Oil and water don't mix," Key West-based Reef Relief Executive Director DeeVon Quirolo said. "This would be a disaster for Florida. The Legislature should be looking more at pursuing pending legislation on renewable energy."

Vote to lift ban

The House Policy Council voted to lift a legislative ban on drilling in state waters and allow the governor and Cabinet to approve leases as close as three miles off Florida. The proposed legislation, H.B. 1219, heads to the floor. Its Senate companion, S.B. 2294, has yet to have a committee hearing.

Supporters released a Mason-Dixon Polling and Research survey showing 59 percent of respondents support drilling off Florida's coast.

"We're giving the governor and Cabinet that chance to have that dialogue with no obligation whatsoever," House Speaker Dean Cannon, R-Winter Park, told members. "But we are taking away the shackles that currently prohibit Florida from not only pursuing energy independence but economic development and security and environmental protection."

Surprise bill

The legislation came as a surprise to critics. Tuesday's agenda was not released until late Monday night and the amendment containing the drilling proposal was not available until just before Tuesday's meeting. Supporters were prepared with talking points and background material related to the amendment that opponents had not had a chance to see in advance.

Keys Rep. Ron Saunders said he and other Democrats were surprised by the legislation. In a 17-6 vote, all Democrat committee members voted against it, Saunders said.

"The Republicans knew this was coming and didn't share it with us," Saunders said. "I don't expect it to pass, but we are going to keep our guard up."

Florida law now restricts oil exploration and drilling in state waters, which extend nine miles into the Gulf of Mexico. Since approved, gas prices have climbed to more than $4 a gallon, but dropped significantly to about $2 a gallon.

Many federal and state officials say it's time for lawmakers to take another look at the rules. The proposal would lift the moratorium on drilling in Florida waters and allow the governor and Cabinet to make the call.

Companies that wanted a lease would have to pay a $1 million nonrefundable deposit to seek state approval. Once a lease were let, competing companies would be able to review it and offer competing proposals.

Proceeds from the leases would fund the Florida Forever land buying program up to $300 million a year, which is its current funding level. The earmarks also include $20 million for local beach restoration and $20 million for local governments in areas affected by the leases, according to the House bill.

"Our reliance on fossil fuel will continue for at least the next generation," said Barney Bishop, president and CEO of Associated Industries of Florida. "It's time for Florida to become a national leader in energy independence ... and reap the benefits of billions of new revenue dollars."

Critics argued the bill lacked specificity in regard to royalties, severance tax and other payment to the state. Given the dollars involved, those details should be answered, they said.

"Lifting the prohibition does not mean that issuing permits to drill will actually happen," said Martha Barnett, a lobbyist for Florida Energy Associates, a coalition of independent oil companies that wants the moratorium lifted. "It opens up the opportunity for that."

U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson quickly came out against the legislation.

"I can't believe some Florida lawmakers might actually be serious about allowing oil drilling within 10 miles offshore," Nelson said. "They even want to 'expedite' permits for refineries in coastal communities."

The News Service of Florida contributed to this report.

tohara@keysnews.com

I say Drilll Baby Drill

Well, we could get some good paying jobs if they are close by that's for sure because the Tourist Industry does not pay [their] workers a living wage and some hire [illegals] and when Cuba opens up this place will turn in to a ghost town. [Cruise] ships will by-pass us. I see the writing on the wall dont you?

Nobody believes them anymore...

They have been crying wolf for so long, nobody believes them. Drilling for oil is already happening and the US is standing by as Cuba and China deplete the resources which should be ours. There will be no spills. Even if there are, they are contained quickly. The technology makes it that serious oil spills are a thing of the past--relegated to remote areas where civilization is far way.

RED ALERT - RED ALERT - RED ALERT

These long-winded and, obviously, pre-prepared comments, one appealing to our rational side and the other mongering fear of the "Chi-coms" and Cuba, should have set off your BS Alert System. Please, proceed to the nearest wall and put your back against it! In this way, you may be able to avoid getting screwed! This is a dangerous proposition and just another excuse to put off what really needs to be done.

Common Arguments Are Not Supported by the Facts

MYTH: Drilling offshore will lead to ocean spillage, damaging wildlife and beaches.

FACT: In fact, virtually all of the pollution and “spillage” comes from large tankers transporting oil from other countries and natural seepages. Thus, drilling for our American oil would actually reduce the risk of oil pollution by reducing the number of international oil tankers entering our ports. Offshore spills have occurred, but offshore drilling companies have an exceptional record of preventing spills and minimizing environmental damage, due primarily to technological innovation. Norway, which is a major exporter of oil and acquires all of it from offshore, also has an outstanding record of drilling in the sea, and there’s no reason why we would take fewer precautions than the Norwegians. Everyone promoting offshore drilling wants to do it in compliance with environmental safeguards, which in the United States are some of the most stringent in the world. This is unlike other nations, such as China, which announced a partnership with Cuba in 2006 to start drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico. That nation’s dismal environmental record should force Congress to make a decision: Do we let another nation drill for oil near us and risk major environmental catastrophe, or do we do it ourselves with better environmental protection?

MYTH: Oil companies currently have 68 million acres of leased public lands that contain large amounts of economically recoverable oil available. Drilling in these areas could generate 4.8 million barrels a day so opening up more land is not necessary.

FACT: The estimates on the amount of oil available in those 68 million acres have been derived by assuming that the unused acres can produce the same amount as those acres being used. However, much of the land leased to oil companies has already been explored and determined not to carry enough recoverable oil to justify drilling. This is in stark contrast to the other 97% of currently banned offshore resources and areas with shale oil, where enormous quantities are known to exist. That opponents to greater U.S. exploration believe they understand better than petroleum engineers how we obtain oil from drilling is absolutely ridiculous.

MYTH: Drilling will not provide any short-term relief in the price of oil because it will take many years before new drilling will lead to new supplies.

FACT: This same argument has been used for the past several decades to prevent us from using more of our American oil, leading to our current dependence on foreign oil and the supply crunch we are currently experiencing. Does this mean critics of greater American energy exploration were wrong 10 years ago, 20 years ago, and 30 years ago but are suddenly right today now? Drilling more now will increase supplies in the future. And higher supplies lead to lower prices. Currently, the world is operating at or near full capacity, so there is very little slack in the system, and any disruption causes spike in price. This is partly why commodities and other investors have invested so heavily in oil, driving up prices. They recognize demand will continue to increase and that current supply has artificial limits, especially in the United States. Opening up new oil fields in the U.S., even if new supplies won’t actually reach our gas tank for several years, would immediately impact the amount of upward speculation on long-term commodity investment in oil. Oil speculators will see a greater supply ahead and will see that the future of oil is less constrained on the supply side. Moreover, fears of Middle Eastern turmoil or South American unrest that could disrupt supply shipments will be much less of a reason to drive up the price of crude if a stable U.S. can supply millions of barrels of additional oil. Which represents a more stable source of oil, Colorado or Caracas? Finally, nobody is suggesting that our nation’s energy strategy should be solely dependent on domestic production of oil. We all recognize that alternative energy sources – such as wind and solar - need to be developed. But more American oil must be a part of an American energy solution.

MYTH: The U.S. only has a small percentage (from 2-6%) of the world’s oil supplies, and since oil is a global commodity, our increased production won’t affect prices much if at all.

FACT: This estimate of 2-6% of the world’s oil supplies does not hold up to scrutiny. In oil shale alone, found in the Green River Formation in parts of Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming, the U.S. has approximately 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil, or over three times the proven reserves of Saudi Arabia. This comes from a midpoint estimate in a 2005 RAND study done at the request of the Department of Energy, and a higher end estimate puts the number at over one trillion barrels. Furthermore, there are vast areas of the United States and its outer continental shelf where it is illegal to even look for oil. Exploration routinely yields additional resources far larger than initial estimates. Resources from oil shale and additional oil resources that are likely to be discovered are not included in the estimates of American oil supplies.

.

Here Is My Vote

NO

Thats Bull

you are the same people that are against Nuclear power which dose not emit green house gases. If you dont drill and dont build Nukes you will be heading back to the cave man days. so wake up build nukes, solar, wind power and other green power sources then maybe you could cut oil by 2/3 in 50 years untill then we need to supply america and not supply the cash for the people that hates us and wants to hurt us. so please wake up and smell the crude oil!

Don't be fooled by fictions from salesmen

"...virtually all of the pollution and 'spillage' comes from large tankers transporting oil from other countries and natural seepages..." This so-called fact is completely false. Last summer when a hurricane went through the Gulf it hit an oil rig causing an oil spill. Oil spills from offshore rigs are actually relatively common. The other assertions made by this commenter are founded on the premise that we should focus on fossil fuels for our energy supply. This is a dead end road. Eventually fossil fuels run out; they are a finite resource. So, an alternate source of energy will have to be found. Does it make sense to further destroy the environment just to end up behind in the game when fossil fuel use is no longer possible? If Florida wants to boost its economy through energy production the state should really look at boosting solar energy. Does Florida have a lack of sunlight? That's rhetorical, don't answer it. Florida could be a leader in this energy production of the future and instead of jumping on the dying industry of fossil fuel production, at huge environmental cost, Florida could be ahead in an industry that is sure to grow and be a major part of the solution to coming energy problems. A sustainable economy that will continue on instead of an unsustainable economy that is sure to fall.

Well Reasoned Reply

Why didn't you just say, "Oh yea" ?

.

Flush your ALGORE toilet twice to vote to Drill Here Drill Now

It's time to stop the Chicken Little approach to our national resources

The Chi-Coms have rigs 20 miles off Key West now and some how I don't believe they answer to the pantywaists at the EPA

We have the technology and the ability to safely retrieve oil from the huge off shore deposits and to ignore the economic realities of domestic production vs.. foreign production because of the unfounded hyperbole of the few Luddites who are against everything is simply stupid

The people we are dependent upon now hate us and fly our planes into our buildings and kill us .... and want to kill more of us

Given the safe and proven drilling technology available today, here is no credible reason not to produce our own oil from off shore sources

There is no other available technology to replace oil ... not now ... not 20 years from now ....and the hard earned money sent to dictators and despots who hate us in places like Venezuela and the Middle East is the greatest transfer of wealth in all of recorded history

It's time to stop the tree hugging nonsense .... When Katrina and Wilma rolled over the Keys and the Gulf of Mexico not one drop of oil was spilled ..... so stop listening to the fear mongers

The cost of oil effects every aspect of our lives every day and has the greatest economic impact upon each of us (even more then Monique Aceveto) ... it is foolish to allow people who hate us to have such a lucrative advantage over us when it is clearly not necessary

Drill Here Drill Today

.

are you kidding?

a lot of oil was spilled during both those hurricanes, you can look it up online very easy http://www.newser.com/story/39199/ike-spilled-500k-gallons-of-gulf-oil.h... 9 million gallons spilled during katrina

Agreement

Total agreement. Not only are our oil rigs safe, they weathered Katrina. Off of Galveston, divers love the oil rigs as they have made verical habitat for fishes and living coral.

So Sad....

You fell for it. What a shame. If you can take a little time away from watching, listening and reading those who tell you what your opinion is and do a little research and thinking for yourself, you will find that you don't really agree and that you've been fooled. But alas, you're probably another who is too busy to take the time to think for yourself, which is what causes most of the problems in the world today.

Pure BS. The only thing

Pure BS. The only thing standing between making Florida's beaches into another Exxon Valdez tragedy is this legislation and a little blow like Andrew...

DRILL HERE , DRILL NOW, PAY

DRILL HERE , DRILL NOW, PAY LESS

I was just reading a few

I was just reading a few weeks ago how we are trying to tax the commercial fisherman out of business. Pshh, you wont have to when one of the drillings go wrong. There wont be anything left!!
More Florida Keys Headlines
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
1 comment
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Monday, February 8, 2010
4 comments
Monday, February 8, 2010
43 comments
Monday, February 8, 2010
14 comments
Available Only in the Electronic Edition
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 -
Monday, February 8, 2010 -
Sunday, February 7, 2010 -
Saturday, February 6, 2010 -
Friday, February 5, 2010 -
Friday, February 5, 2010 -