Florida Keys News - Key West Citizen
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Add to FacebookAdd to Twitter
School Board considers administrator contracts
Financial issues likely to be focus of discussion

The Monroe County School Board's tires meet the road today. At least that's how board member John Dick sees it.

The board either will approve the return of administrators who have been blamed for lack of oversight -- or they won't.

School Board members are expected to consider whether punishment should be meted out to administrators who, according to a district investigation, failed to halt credit card abuse, theft and other financial irregularities. Board members can approve renewed contracts for administrators with a simple majority vote. Or they can make a motion to amend the list and seek votes on action toward specific administrators, from a simple reprimand to demotion or termination.

Acting Superintendent Mike Henriquez posted his recommendations for contract renewals on the district's Web site, but some board members have complained the list has changed at least once since it was posted.

More than a reprimand

"You don't think the list will be approved on the consent agenda, do you?" Dick asked rhetorically Monday. "I will go on record that a reprimand is not enough for what has happened here. Between the actual fraud and the cost of the investigation, it's costing the school district over a million dollars. To me, a reprimand wouldn't hack it."

A June 9 investigator's report cites several administrators -- including Henriquez, Finance Director Kathy Reitzel and purchase card administrator Linda Walker -- for failing to maintain financial controls that would have prevented what appears to be a pattern of illegal purchases by former Adult Education Coordinator Monique Acevedo.

Acevedo allegedly failed to turn in student fees and other cash collected for cosmetology courses, and did not submit credit card receipts and other purchasing documentation for five months. She is suspected of using her card to make personal purchases.

Vocational Education Coordinator Mark Hooper also was cited in the report for not turning in credit card receipts for nearly nine months, and Transportation Director Dori Collins was cited for using the school credit card assigned to Construction Director Chuck Freeman and for allowing Acevedo to use Freeman's credit card to purchase lumber.

Must have cause

"If there's a person we want to single out, we have to have cause," board member Steve Pribramsky said. "I want to see some demotions, and at some point I want to see the board reprimand the group as a whole, by either not returning [them] at all or not having them in the position they're in now. This is not about a reprimand."

Pribramsky said he worried the original list of recommendations Henriquez posted a week ago has changed significantly -- the list must be made public at least seven days before the board can vote on them. The board has until July 9 to notify employees.

"This is very troublesome to me that the list keeps changing," Pribramsky said. "[Business and Fiscal Services Executive Director] Pedro Fraga's name was on Mike's list to be returned next year on an annual contract, but he is now on the list of retirees," he said. "There are a lot of names that aren't on Mike's list that were there last week," he said Monday.

Need for paper trail

In an interview two weeks ago, board member Debra Walker said she'd prefer employees in the future be given a paper trail of letters of warning, written reprimands and other administrative corrections before they're dismissed outright.

"My immediate thoughts are to follow our attorneys' recommendations," Walker said Monday. Attorney Latour Lafferty told the board last week that actions by administrators cited in the June 9 report might not be cause for termination. He characterized their lack of oversight as failing to do their jobs, not as criminal misbehavior.

Board Chairman Andy Griffiths did not return calls for comment by press time Monday.

Board member Duncan Mathewson repeatedly has said he wants to see "consequences" for district employees who failed to prevent the collapse of internal financial controls.

The board is awaiting the appointment by the governor of an interim superintendent, who also could determine who will retain their jobs. That appointment might not come until August, however.

Job requirements

Dick also wants the board to discuss administrators with high school degrees who, on average, make $75,000 a year. Teachers with bachelor's degrees and doctorates don't earn that much, he said.

"It's not about the people in the positions," Dick said. "It's about equity in salaries."

Dick has compiled a list of positions for which job qualifications were reduced from bachelor's degrees to general equivalency degrees or high school diplomas.

"Several job requirements have apparently been changed to allow people with a high school diploma to hold jobs," Dick said.

One such position is assistant director of facilities, which used to require a bachelor's degree in engineering. The position was renamed "assistant director of maintenance," which requires a high school diploma or GED. The position pays $77,000.

The transportation director's job used to require a bachelor's degree, but was changed to require an associate degree. The person in that job has some paralegal training, Dick said.

The food service and purchasing director, a single position, still requires bachelor's degree, but the person in that position only has a high school diploma, Dick said.

Also on the agenda

The board also is expected to:

• Discuss contracts for Business and Fiscal Services Executive Director Pedro Fraga and Title 1 Director Eleanor Garcia. Both are retiring, but will work as consultants on annual contracts that can be canceled with 30 days notice. The two are vital until their positions can be advertised and filled, Henriquez said.

• Hear from the investigator the School Board hired as he finalizes his reporting to the board. He was to review a new batch of credit card receipts dating back to 2003. The board asked him to report on credit card use by John Andola, the district's Adult Education and Vocational Education director until 2005. He was Acevedo's direct supervisor.

• Consider contracts with Outward Bound; out-of-county travel, Century 21 summer program funding and other contracts.

jguerra@keysnews.com

Share your thoughts and opinions related to this posting. Login or register to post comments. More Info

We need to get rid of the

We need to get rid of the new "gang of three" on the SB. Andy knew about this ten years ago when the Sugarloaf SAC went to him with the same type of stuff (missing fundraising money, inappropriate spending, questionable purchases, and misuse of FCAT money) and he did NOTHING. Again, he will do NOTHING

Just think..The Acevedos pulled in over $1M in the last 5 yrs

This doesn't include the monies she "madeoff" with or the monies they got each time they refinanced their home. These people have a very serious problem. Can no one see this? Daddy Acevedo- were you on the take, too?

Sadly in any other

Sadly in any other situation, incompetent persons wwould be fired. I believe we have several persons who were NOT competent at their jobs, but as Monique said "it's always been done this way". Since we are all "buddies" and hired without proper credentials-perhaps-it is possible that nobody wanted to "rock the boat"? WELL..they all need to go overboard! Lets prosecute ALL thieves (going back as far as possible) to the full extent of the law. Provide an example to our children and all these Bubba's who do not know the meaning of honesty, public service, or a christian attitude.."do onto others". It is time to clear out the rats and begin anew.

Antiques Road Show

I guess the Administrators are still using policy and procedures from 1901 huh! What no one thought to have a paper trail before (oh thats right if you do you can go to jail) Get real this is just unbelievable these people are educated so are they going to try and pull the dumb card on the public. There had to be some way to track what was and was not spent and if spending was incorrect a way to handle this. Someone got use to having their hand in the cookie jar and no one was there to smack them to keep them out of it. Now too many hands have been in the cookie jar and the next cry they will make is they have no money. SHAME ON ALL OF YOU, YOU ALL SHOULD BE FIRED!

Why would anyone want to do the proper thing?

Written notification and then an evaluation of how it was resolved ...that's the way it SHOULD have been done. Then of course, it would be easy to terminate. BUT they didn't want to follow any procedure because they were all guilty.

State's attorney must be in Daddy Acevado's pocket

At today's SB meeting, Randy's daddy wasn't concerned about all the money Randy misappropriated or Monique allegely stole. NOOOOO. He wanted the SB to stop investigating them and let the State's Attorney do the work. Is this the same SA who has never put out a warrant to search the Acevedo's home? Maybe it's all been moved to Daddy's by now. Looks like Daddy realizes the SA has made a mess of this and hopes he will continue on this path of destruction. But I will agree with Daddy A. on one point: Fechter and Lafferty are not worth jack. They have wasted too much valuable time and still have not given the SB the data and cause needed to FIRE all these policy violators. Fechter and Lafferty sound like a couple of bubbas...we'll get to that MANANA. Don't know this Davidson guy but he is the only person I heard at the meeting that made sense (besides John Dick, Duncan and at times, Steve who was somewhat quiet today...Bookie, the INTIMIDATOR, must have been in the audience).

They had a warrant

They waited until all the items were moved somewhere else prior to them serving the search warrant by that time everything was taken somewhere else. Yeah Daddy is worried because he knows his son and his sons wife are going to jail.

If you watched the school board meeting today...

then you must be totally fed up! First, some bubba(s)have gotten to Fechter and Lafferty. They've been in Key West toooo long. Too many opportunities to get jaded. I can't believe that Fechter brought absolutely NOTHING to the SB for their consideration and Lafferty repeated himself continually and accomplished NOTHING. Randy Acevedo's father was allowed to call two of our SB members, "dicks." He had the audacity to say everyone including Randy should be put back in power and go back to business as usual. He told Andy, "you should take control..." The bubba-cheering squad (Sunny Booker must have been there) was clapping loudly and up to their usual intimidation methods...making snide comments while Capt. Ed Davison gave an eloquent, well prepared and statute-based factual speech. No claps for him, of course. Oh, yeah, Fechter was supposed to give specifics about Andola...RIGHT. His only comment: Andola had a P-card from 2000-2003 and then gave it to Monique. Unbelievable --THAT'S all he had to report about Andola. What a laugh Labrada whining about the SB wanting the Gov. to appoint someone outside the county. Labrada is one of the culprits. And this Margo Romero accusing the Board of discrimination because they want a qualified, educated superintendent (with no ties to this den of thieves.) I'd like to know if she and Labrada clapped after Acevedo's father spoke. Was anyone there who can tell me? What a farce about the MAG report (once again Fechter only had time to "download the 400 pages report"). Thank God for Duncan who finally defended John Dick's position on how an educational entity can lower their standards by hiring people who only have GED or high school diplomas. Fred Sims is a real piece of work comparing his "24-7" assistant who oversees 60 people deserving of a salary that our highly educated teachers make who are charged with our children's future. That guy needs to be canned.

Leon, Leon, Leon

Another missed opportunity to defend teachers. Where were you while Fred Sims was defending Dori Collins for making 94K when teachers do more work and make half that?

two d*cks?

That's some spicy language right there, I don't care who you are.

Unbelievable

Randy's father just told off John and Steve at the school board meeting. He said that "everything was great in the school district and that Randy did a good job until those two Dicks got on the board." Now do you see how corrupt these individuals are? This guy would rather insult the board than address the wrongdoings that his son and daughter in-law have committed. Notice how he was so friendly towards Andy. Do you think Andy has made a deal?

Randy acevedo's dad A REAL CLASS ACT!

Randy's dad what an . . . The Acevedos and the mahdoffs what a bunch of [allegedly] self serving thieves. During todays schoolboard meeting Randy's dad spoke. He called John and Steve a pair of Dicks! Comming from a jerk like him that's almost a complimentRandy'a dad sounded like a ignorant white trash high schooler who just flunked out of Key West High! Mr. Acevedo are you really that ignorant that you cannot override your blind fatherly love and admit that your son may be corrupt and aledgedly a thief!

I agree

The Acevedos are really showing their true colors.

speaking of contracts

This from the UTM website: Collective Bargaining updates: June 23, 2009 Little progress has been made toward reaching agreements in contract negotiations for teachers and school related personnel. After three meetings, teams have exchanged proposals for each bargaining unit and have discussed each proposal. Some minor agreement have been verbally reached. Salary issues are still pending. The next meeting is scheduled for Friday, June 26. Following this meeting, no other meetings are expected until August. June 26, 2009 The bargaining teams met on Friday, June 26th. UTM submitted proposals including some counters to the Board’s School Related Personnel contract as well as proposals including some counters to the Board’s Teacher contract. There were some agreements reached in each contract. UTM inquired as to a financial proposal from the Board. UTM was told that the Board wanted to “wait and see.” UTM was told that the Board feels that the upcoming school year may be worse with regard to roll backs than the 2008-09 school year. The next meeting has been scheduled for August 3rd.

Lets face it.

These people are bubbas I was at the meeting I live in Marathon. If you look at the film you will see all the relatives sitting with dori And the Principals that are girls are her relatives. The board coul'nt see this. They just dont want a law suite. So its ok to use someones P- Card and sign signitures to someones card. I like to try that my but would be fired at my job. Mathewson copped out. And Walker is good friends with these people. Andy you are a big coward you talk the talk but you cant walk the walk. I say fire all the board members and bring in the FBI. Hey everyone go and steal a credit card and use it for good cause. See if you get arrested. Bubba sucks.

Paper Trail

The reason there is no paper trail is they never wrote up their wifes!!

Wives

Correct spelling

Check out Agenda goals for today's meeting at 2 p.m. TV 78.

Goal Area 4 – All employees are highly qualified, effective, dedicated to continuous improvement, and committed to achieving the vision. (This means FIRE THEM ALL who aren't "highly qualified, effective..." Goal Area 7 – The district continues its leadership and investment in advanced technology. (Hooray for our techie savvy EX-Supintendent!) Goal Area 8 - The district’s fiscal management is world-class. (This must be a mistake----I think they mean world-ass fiscal management.)

I said it before and I will

I said it before and I will say it again. Everyone gets re-hired, raises will follow. A letter of reprimand will be recommended, but probably will never be done. After several weeks, everyone involved gets a supplimental pay bonus for all of their "extra time and hard work". Meanwhile, teacher raises will wait until mid-November or early December while policies are implemented, such as reissuing p-cards and open purchase orders. Teachers recieve a 2% raise retroactive to the start of the school year, administration will get 5%. And we're back to business as usual!!

Re: I told you so

I am not talking about Randy or Monique as they have both been arrested and will be tried in criminal court on "criminal" charges. I am speaking of the other district administrators being terminated for cause. It is not an all or nothing proposition. The board can vote to amend the list and then address each individual on a case by case basis. If that's what needs to be done then the board should just DO IT. These individuals have been cited with a lack of oversight not criminal misbehavior. Did this lack of oversight end up costing the district aprox. $1,000.000.00? Did these people sign agreements on the proper use of P-cards? Should some of these people lose their jobs because of the situation? Absolutely yes to all three questions. Now here is the problem though. You have the chairman of the school board publicly state "No one in our system and we have a lot of non teachers working in our system, working with money, working with transactions who brought this up over two years ago and it wasn't followed up on it wasn't fixed". Andy didn't state one or two people brought this up over two years ago he stated a lot of non teachers who work with the money and transactions brought this up over two years ago. That is the statement the chairman made publicly and it can be verified. So the question by an ALJ would be "What type of disciplinary action was given to the employees involved when this was discovered over two years ago. And the only answer according to Andy could be none it wasn't followed up on and it wasn't fixed. You see this is why I get so pissed off at those that run to the press and public forum to run their mouths instead of just doing their jobs. You end up looking kind of stupid later on saying well yeah that's what I said but its not what I meant. I think I will stick with Lafferty and play the Pass Line.

Fraga and Garcia contracts

Henriquez says these retiring administrators need to be retained on contract because their positions are "vital" and the district has not yet advertised for replacements. Didn't the school district know that they were retiring?

Fraga and Garcia contracts

and don't they have subordinates who can hold down the fort while replacements are being sought?

Dare To Fire These Miscreants?

I want to know why Ward hasn't charged them all as coconspirators?

Ward might at least get a little more cooperation on that tact

And Andola and his boyfriend (may) have commited at least bank fraud if they claimed the P-Card went missing all the while knowing that they had gone on a spending spree

Attorneys are like plumbers - you tell them upon which wall which you want the sink - you don't let them design the house - they work for you

If Latour (do you think his parents hated him?) Lafferty's opinion is that the theft of half a million doesn't rise to the level of discharge (and has cost another half a million to come to that 'safe' and silly conclusion) it's time to find a plumber who will put the sink on the wall we want it on

If this School Board lets any of these miscreants stay - they should go

... and shame on our feckless RINO of a Governor for letting this drag on

Ward can't charge everyone

that was stupid or incompetent, or knows how to spell Acevedo. The law doesn't work like that. Now if you have some secrt information that all the investigators couldn't find like Reitzel having a Swiss bank account, then please say so and turn that information over to Ward.

Administrator Contracts

Well folks, we have ourselves a "major cluster f#@&". $1,000,000 plus dollars involved as stated by board member John Dick and legal council and they don't have the balls, oops, grounds to terminate. I have spent several hours reading the agenda for today's school board meeting, if they pass the contracts submitted by acting Supt Henriquez they may as well turn Monique and Randy loose and go back to "business as usual". Somebody has to be responsible for what has happened in the district. That someone, usually will be parked at the top of the organizational chart. I believe the only way to get the district under control is to terminate and then litigate, if need be. Yes, it well probably cost the school district some money, but considering the alternative, of keeping the status quo, I say do it, TODAY. I believe the School Board Members are handicapped under the current format of an elected Supt, their power is limited, until today, now they can do the right thing. Gov Charley has stuck his head in the sand and failed to make a decision, it appears to be quite simple, just do it. He is waiting for the school board to act and then he will appoint someone to read in on the white horse and take all the credit, can't wait to see who is setting high in the saddle. Most of the post are negative to the board, let me remind you, there are 5 board members, they sink or swim together, Several are using the media to state their opinions, knowing they don't have the power to act, some are taking the professional approach, waiting until they can legally act. I would have thought legal action would have been taken with several other district employees, that may be a sign of a very weak case by the State Attorney on the Acevedos. Doing nothing and placing a letter in their file is not the path to take.

Bubba fix is on

These people should all be fired. Now the board is going to get cold feet because they may not have cause of action to terminate for each? Contract employees don't require a cause. There is no better cause than financial wrong doing. If the fired employee has an issue, let them sue. It will be a lot cheaper than trying to retain these thieves. One last thing. This school board is out of their minds if they retain any of these people after retirement (Fraga, etc). Today will decide who I vote and campaign against at the next election.

Right is Right, and Wrong is Wrong

There are rules, procedures, and policies to be followed. Ignorance and turning the other cheek are not excuses. These are well educated people and know that they did not do the job they were paid to do. If they had done their jobs, the district would not have suffered the financial devastation that it did. I am sorry and in these tough economic times, I am sorry to see anyone lose his/her job; however, there are qualified people out there who are willing to follow the rules, procedures, and policies who will help this district turn around and do what is right for the students, teachers, employees, and our community.

cause of action to terminate?

I think the issue is as follows:... when the recommendation from administration is to "keep" people-and... if the board rejects the recommendation from administration... then the board needs "cause" in order to reject. If Mike H. took the names out and recommended what the board originally wanted, then there is no need for "cause"...they are annual contracts. The problem is that Mike will not do the job - he would be cutting his own throat. The board needs to reject the recommendation and direct mike to rework it and bring it back. If he refuses - reject the contracts and use the "incompetence" grounds as cause. There is plenty of evidence to support an "incompetence" position.

District Policy

These people signed their name to the district policy that outlined the use of p-cards when they got the p-card. They knowingly violated rules. They should be fired.

Yes, yes, yes.

No mercy. These people are policy violators and need to be fired. If that's not CAUSE enough then our district has no teeth whatsoever.

What Policy?

It seems they do not have policy to follow they are just making it up as they go. Get real they make policy on a daily basis so they can get out of trouble!

I told you so

Debra Walker should start yelling I told you so about "right now". Either she really paid attention to what Lafferty reported to the board or she already knows the districts disciplinary policy. Like I have said before personally it makes no difference to me who stays and who goes. I will tell you what makes a difference though. Lafferty specifically told the board "that actions by administrators cited in the June 9 report might not be cause for termination. He characterized their lack of oversight as failing to do their jobs, not as criminal misbehavior." Now you can say that's bull crap they didn't do their jobs so fire them or whatever words you want to use. That is all fine and well to say but may not reach the threshold to show cause before an ALJ or in court. The next question from the ALJ will be "has Mr. XYZ ever had any (documented) verbal or written warnings or reprimands, and if they have lets see the documentation for when and what policy violations". It usually takes a very serious policy violation for dismissal without previous violation. I will agree that the amount of money that the district has loss is "serious" so don't start blasting me with that. The question that has to be answered is "what actual individual action or inaction" did each person contribute that allowed the loss to take place. If it was "lack of oversight" as Lafferty pointed out, does that rise to the threshold of a "serious" policy violation. For the sake of argument lets say it does. Now we have to look and see if a similar situation has taken place in the district in the past. We all know that a few years ago there was also another unauthorized use of P-card controversy. The court will look at what disciplinary measure were employed against those that didn't do their jobs then question why similar discipline wasn't used in this case. I could start citing case law for you but thats what you are paying Lafferty for. Its a crap shoot at this point. Go ahead and roll the dice, I hope you don't crap out. I'll stick with Lafferty and play the Pass Line.

I hate restraint and advice from

attorneys who would like to see everyone walk on egg shells. FIRE THEM ALL! And send a really clear message.

High School Diplomas?? Another outrage!

The public needs to know who these people are. Are they relatives of current and past administrators? Leave no stone unturned, John, Steve and finally Duncan. I'm hoping Andy will see the light, too. Walker is a lost cause. Spare no one who isn't qualified or who broke the rules. Our children need to see there are consequences for those who violate policies and ultimately have hurt the trust we have in our district. PLEASE do the RIGHT thing and take action today. Don't let the threat of lawsuits deter you. Remember anyone can sue for anything. Lafferty is just covering his butt.

Fired for Cause?

Since when is criminal misbehavior the only reason an employee can be terminated? They've terminated others for much less than "failure to do their job". How much more incompetent must one be to be removed from a job? Especially when the incompetence allowed criminal behavior by another employee/s. Florida is not a right to work state. You can fire at will. Please board...grow a pair and do your job!

First of all Debra Walker

wouldn't agree regardless because she only cares about one thing and that is protecting these people. The thing that gets me the most about this is that they do this to teachers on annual contract all the time. They don't renew them and say sorry I don't have to give a reason. Just like they did to the two principals they can easily just non-renew these people. Then they don't even have to go through the cause route. Although I think there is enough evidence to fire for cause. LT was just giving options. Anytime you fire someone for cause you are risking a law suit and this may be a chance worth taking to restore dignity. What unauthorized p-card controversy are you talking about?

You people have got to be kidding me?

You don't do your job, you cost the school district a million bucks overall, cause all sorts of problems, and that is NOT grounds for termination. What are these people smoking? What world do they think they live in? And many of them aren't even qualified for the jobs they have in the first place! This is the peter principle carried to the extreme. Are all these people in charge clueless?

That's what is wrong

What happened to responsibility, morals, doing the right thing. The reason our great USA is in the shape it is in is because people are able to do whatever they want and not have to pay any consequences or restitution. I'm sure there are a lot of good people out there who need a job and who would do a good job if given the chance. Fire the bad guys/thieves!!!!!!!!!!

You hititon thehead!!!!!

Good post!!!!!

Insurance

I would like to know why married school board employees don't have to pay insurance? Did anyone know that if your married and you both work for the school board your insurance is free. What's that about?

Insurance

Teachers and non-administrators pay the health insurance premiums. Administrators have free health insurance thanks to the other MCSD employees.

It is called Bubba

It is called Bubba insurance! Just another perk for the administrators, (making the most money) that the rest of us pay for!

It's Simple

When you see that she has listed 3 dependants on the court forms she filled out, you'll realize easily how these people not only break the law with impunity, but do so to such an extent that they literally feel that they are entitled to this sort of thing.(Isn't their oldest son a grown man with his own business?) They are all in on it and they don't care who they run over as long as they don't go to jail. But even then, that's not enough. They obviously want to continue this madness in the future. They want their cake and they want to eat it too. And they want you, I and the rest of America to pick up the tab. Brace yourself because after this meeting, we are all going to be pissed!
More Florida Keys Headlines
Friday, July 30, 2010
2 comments
Friday, July 30, 2010
Friday, July 30, 2010
1 comment
Friday, July 30, 2010
Friday, July 30, 2010
1 comment
Available Only in the Electronic Edition
Friday, July 30, 2010 -
Thursday, July 29, 2010 -
Wednesday, July 28, 2010 -
Tuesday, July 27, 2010 -