


The Monroe County School Board, with its members split on what to do with employees who failed to prevent the apparent theft of public money by a school administrator, will hear its options for employee disciplinary action today.
Richard Fechter, an investigator the board hired to sample thousands of employee credit card receipts, interview employees and track financial records, will present his final findings.
Latour "L.T." Lafferty, an attorney specializing in public corruption who the School Board hired to advise its members during the investigation, will weigh in after Fechter summarizes his report. When Fechter released his preliminary report in June, Lafferty suggested the board wait until the final report before making any decisions on discipline.
At least two School Board members said they are concerned about having acting Schools Superintendent Mike Henriquez involved in the process, as he is among the department heads who Fechter faulted for failing to catch the alleged theft by former Adult Education Coordinator Monique Acevedo.
"Mike would normally work with our attorney to craft the recommendations for the board for the disciplinary action against employees," School Board member Steve Pribramsky said. "But I really don't think it's appropriate for Mike to do this. He's the most honest guy in the world, but he's an integral part of the report."
Board member John Dick said an interim superintendent, which Gov. Charles Crist has promised since he suspended Schools Superintendent Randy Acevedo on June 11, should be the one who determines punishment.
"The problem is Mike is from the previous administration," Dick said. "I like him fine, but the governor has got to appoint a new superintendent so we can have him give us direction on employee punishment, if there is any."
In his preliminary report, Fechter named several department heads who he said should have discovered and reported more than $180,000 in missing cash and at least $118,000 in suspicious purchases charged to the district credit card issued to Monique Acevedo, wife of Randy Acevedo.
Administrators named as culpable in that report included the Acevedos, Henriquez, Finance Director Kathy Reitzel and purchase card administrator Linda Walker. Before being named acting superintendent, Henriquez, was deputy superintendent under Randy Acevedo, and the direct supervisor of Monique Acevedo.
Reitzel told investigators she warned Randy Acevedo 18 months before his wife resigned that she was making personal purchases on her school district credit card, and reported it to authorities in late February. Reitzel was faulted for not reporting it earlier.
Walker was in charge of ensuring department heads hand in their district credit card receipts and documentation of travel expenses or other purchases. She was faulted for failing to ensure that policy on credit card reporting was followed, including some situations in which credit card holders failed to turn in receipts for months at a time.
Fechter's report is important for reasons other than disciplining employees, School Board member Steve Pribramsky said.
"Richard is quantifying the (credit) card losses," he said. "We want to provide that to the state's attorney so the judge can include it -- if Monique is found guilty -- in her restitution, if he decides to do that.
"We also need that figure for our insurance claim, so we can maybe get it back that way," Pribramsky said. The district also could use the dollar amount in a civil lawsuit against the Acevedos if it decides to sue, he said.
Board Chairman Andy Griffiths and member Debra Walker declined to comment, and member Duncan Mathewson did not return phone calls Monday.
jguerra@keysnews.com
THESE three are a waste of skin and oxygen! Vote them out at the first chance, people. They're part of the problem.
Administrators named as culpable in that report included the Acevedos, Henriquez, Finance Director Kathy Reitzel and purchase card administrator Linda Walker. Before being named acting superintendent, Henriquez, was deputy superintendent under Randy Acevedo,and the direct supervisor of Monique Acevedo.
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly referred to as RICO Act or RICO) is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. While its intended use was to prosecute the Mafia as well as others who were actively engaged in organized crime, its application has been more widespread.
Under RICO, a person who is a member of an enterprise that has committed any two of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison per racketeering count. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity."
When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, he or she has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to temporarily seize a defendant's assets and prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance bond. This provision was placed in the law because the owners of Mafia-related shell corporations often absconded with the assets. An injunction and/or performance bond ensures that there is something to seize in the event of a guilty verdict.
The tribal wisdom of the Dakota Indians, passed on from one generation to the next, says that when you discover that you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount.
But in the Monroe County School District other strategies are often tried with dead horses, including the following:
1. Buying a stronger whip.
2. Exchanging riders.
3. Threatening the horse with termination.
4. Appointing a committee to study the horse.
5. Arranging to visit other sites to see how they ride dead horses.
6. Lowering the standards so that dead horses can be included.
7. Reclassifying the dead horse as “living-impaired”.
8. Hiring outside contractors to ride the dead horse.
9. Harnessing several dead horses together to increase speed.
10. Providing additional funding and/or training to increase the dead horse’s performance.
11. Doing a productivity study to see if lighter riders would improve the dead horse’s performance.
12. Declaring that the dead horse carries lower overhead and therefore contributes more to the bottom line than some other horses.
13. Rewriting the expected performance requirements for all horses.
14. Promoting the dead horse to a supervisory position.
Bookie is laughing his butt off
Heads should have rolled by now
Lafferty's billings are like Monique Acevito's district credit card statements and so far the school district has gotten no more value