there appears to be a considerable amount of red-herring and straw man fallacies being flung about. Anything, I suppose, to look good at this point; as they are all hanging on by their fingernails to the positions they presently occupy. Watch closely within the next few weeks as the fur begins to fly among them...it will be a vicious game that resembles 'musical chairs' as they pull the rug (or chair) out from under one another one-by-one. Wait and see...

... that the same people who used to criticize John Dick and Steven Pribramsky for asking financial questions and "micro-managing" the administration are now blaming the only two board members who asked questions for not finding out sooner that the Acevedos were robbing the district blind! All they got for so many months was BS from the administration and grief from their detractors. They were right to ask questions! Your ilk was wrong then to criticize them and obstruct their mission. How do you now have the nerve to say they are to blame because they should have found out earlier? They did not steal the money. Those criticizing Pribramsky and Dick should be ashamed of themselves.

As recently as this morning and for the last couple of weeks health groups are saying there won't be enough swine flu shots to give to everyone. They are advocating regular flu shots to help keep most of the population relatively safe (not weakening the immune system to be able to fight off swine flu later, if exposed). Right now the high risk groups are elderly, children (under 9 I believe), pregnant women, and health workers.

Not guilty Randy will be back