Florida Keys News - Key West Citizen
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Add to FacebookAdd to Twitter
Judge to hear downstairs enclosure case for third time

A circuit judge has granted Monroe County's request to rehear a high-profile downstairs enclosure case.

Judge David Audlin on Thursday agreed to rehear arguments in the code enforcement case against Sandra Carter on Dec. 4, after having ruled against the county twice in the past year, most recently earlier this month.

In the county's request for a new hearing, Assistant County Attorney Bob Shillinger said Carter should have known downstairs enclosures were prohibited when she bought the house from her uncle in 2001 because she was a real estate agent.

Carter's attorney, however, said he remained confident Friday the judge would not change his ruling.

"He's being very careful," Lee Rohe said. "He probably doesn't want there to be any justification to overturn this if the county files an appeal. ... Ninety percent of the time judges don't change their minds."

The county in June 2007 cited Carter for having an illegal downstairs enclosure. Audlin in October 2007 overruled the county, saying it waited too long to cite the Big Pine Key homeowner and could not pinpoint when the violation occurred. The county appealed the 3rd District Court of Appeal ruling, which overturned Audlin and sent the case back to him for a new hearing.

Audlin earlier this month once again ruled in favor of Carter and ordered the case be dismissed, saying Property Appraiser's Office records have long shown the existence of the downstairs enclosure. The county was aware of the downstairs enclosure in 1983 when it levied taxes on it, but took no action, Audlin said. The county's comprehensive land use plan prohibiting construction at ground level went into effect in 1986, he noted. Additionally, the county in 1975 was required to pass an ordinance prohibiting habitable construction below mean-flood elevation in order to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program, a federally subsidized insurance program.

"We took issue with his determination that the flood plain ordinance was being applied retroactively since the county first adopted a flood plain ordinance in 1975, well before the house was built," Shillinger said of the judge.

While attorneys continue battling the Carter case, the county is asking for amnesty for other people in similar situations. The Monroe County Commission passed a resolution asking the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to change its policy regarding mandatory inspections of downstairs enclosures.

The County Commission approved a proposal granting amnesty for illegal downstairs enclosure rooms created before 2002, when the county launched the inspection program. Under that proposal, property owners would not be allowed to rebuild enclosures if 50 percent of the structures were destroyed in a hurricane or some other natural disaster. The county prohibits bedrooms and living space below homes in the flood plain.

County Mayor George Neugent, Commissioner Mario Di Gennaro and the county staff met with FEMA earlier this summer to discuss the proposal. The two sides planned to meet again in August, but FEMA has postponed it.

Neugent is concerned FEMA did so because it's being lobbied by a citizen-based group, Citizens Not Serfs, which wants amnesty for all Florida Keys property owners. Citizens Not Serfs has hired the high-powered Washington, D.C.-based lobbying and legal firm Patton Boggs to lobby FEMA and the county.

Neugent said he was told that either the Patton Boggs firm or Citizens not Serfs met with FEMA officials to talk about amnesty. The group's representatives said they were not aware of any recent meetings with FEMA, and said the Patton Boggs firm would most likely be in discussions with FEMA.

Citizens Not Serfs has paid for a barrage of radio and newspaper advertisements lobbying for amnesty for all residents. The accuracy of the ads has been questioned. One advertisement claims Islamorada and Marathon are not subject to downstairs enclosures inspections, which they are.

tohara@keysnews.com

Share your thoughts and opinions related to this posting. Login or register to post comments. More Info

Illegal downstairs enclosures

When I lived in the Keys (1988-1997), the only places I could find & afford were the so called "illegal downstairs enclosures"....they were super to live in - it seems that simply to disallow damage claims(should it occur) on insurance - those enclosures have been around for a very very long time. OOPS!!!! Sorry, if there was amnesty, what would George Neugent & his ilk have to complain about and/or cause unnecessary problems. No wonder there is a problem in the Keys because there is a lack of affordable housing. 20 years ago the same fight was going on - C.A.R.E.S. (Concerned Area Residents for Environmental Sanity) was going through the same thing "Citizens Not Serfs" is fighting....good luck to you all - There are many wealthy people who have bought property in the Keys & want to limit access to the rest of us - I moved, even though I owned two small businesses, because I could see the handwriting on the wall - most business people in the Keys are not wealthy, but depend on each other & however they can make a buck. I know so many good people who have moved to other parts of the country because of the politics. Not afraid to put my name to this - Maureen M. Cross

Wake up people

the county has declared war on its taxpayers. Time for some major change on the BOCC. Please don't elect another single issue candidate. Having a brain should be a job requirement. Get rid of Neugent. This guy has thrown the taxpayers to the wolves numerous times to further his political career. George is the first to volunteer the county to do the dirty work of other agencies like FEMA (enclosures), deer refuge (HCP), Fish and Wildlife (feral cats), DCA (evacuations and work program). Exactly who does this joker represent? Surely not the people who elected him. VOTE FOR ANYBODY BUT NEUGENT IN 2010. And I don't mean Sloan, of course

The New Gang of Three

Nugent, Murphy, and Wiggington. The only thing they understand is how to waste taxpayer money on mandates that are illegal in every other County in the US.

How Much?

How much of my money does the County want to spend to keep losing this case. To all the voters that thought they were voting in "new" fiscally conservative commissioners you took the advertising bait. You should have voted for the ones not already connected to the Commission.

You mean

Bob Shillinger hasn't rigged that case yet...The county got Audlin the job so he can rig all of the counties lawsuits...come on David rig it right this time.

Our Tax dollars are Paying for this Idiot's Ego


Why are we allowing this crap to continue? TWICE the county has filed against this woman and lost. TWICE the county taxpayers have paid the idiots from the county attorny's offices to file suit against a fellow taxpayer for a bogus claim--and LOST. Now they must be thinking that the third time is a charm. This is government run amok. The EGOS over there at the county attorney's offices cannot take a loss! One way or another they will fight this woman and make her life miserable, cost her thousands in lawyers--whatever it takes to vindicate their intrusion into our private homes. It has truly become a fight to save their EGO because their is no compelling reason to have her home singled out.

Wake up America! Wake up Florida! Wake up Monroe County! Our government is declaring a war against us and we are slumbering while our rights are being taken. If you don't speak up against this now, who will speak up when they come after you?

Concerned in Sugarloaf

Castro v. Dade a clear Estopple case

967 So 2nd 230

Doctrine of equitable estoppel may be invoked against a governmental entity where (1) a property owner in good faith reliance (2) upon some act or omission of the government (3) has made such a sub-stantial change in position or has incurred such ex-tensive obligations and expenses that it would be highly inequitable and unjust to destroy the right he or she acquired.

Stripped of the legal jargon which lawyers and judges have obfuscated it with, the theory of estoppel amounts to nothing more than an application of the rules of fair play. One party will not be permitted to invite another onto a welcome mat and then be permitted to snatch the mat away to the detriment of the party induced or permitted to stand thereon. A citizen is entitled to rely on the assurances or commitments of a zoning authority and if he does, the zoning authority is bound by its representa-tions, whether they be in the form of words or deeds....

But then just this week Randy and Monique Aceveto's own get-out-of-jail-free Judge David Auldin ignored this case to stretch a ruling for the city - that's why he's the city favorite judge

Auldin is always driven by something beyond the four square of the facts and the law and that is why Judge David Auldin is the most reversed judge in the Circuit

Let's not forget him come election time

It would be nice if for once

It would be nice if for once Judge Auldin would do what he said he would, but most judges here in the Keys take the easy way out.

Wise One

You can't fight city hall. Your wasting your money on something that floods every 6 years. I have a pre 1975 downstairs, its been rigged to take 4 feet of water no problem with durock. But I can say, I rather not have it and not deal with any tenants down there. But they try anything smart on me, and I have my building permit ready for them to view from December 1973. They don't research any of this stuff though, its like "shooting and then aiming"
More Florida Keys Headlines
Friday, July 30, 2010
5 comments
Friday, July 30, 2010
Friday, July 30, 2010
1 comment
Friday, July 30, 2010
Friday, July 30, 2010
1 comment
Available Only in the Electronic Edition
Friday, July 30, 2010 -
Thursday, July 29, 2010 -
Wednesday, July 28, 2010 -
Tuesday, July 27, 2010 -