


Dr. Sharon Ward has diagnosed a half-dozen women in the past five years with breast cancer. All but one of them were younger than 50.
That's why Ward, who has a gynecology and obstetrics practice in Key West, is troubled by a government task force's recent recommendation that most healthy women shouldn't begin routine mammograms until age 50.
New breast-screening guidelines were released Monday by the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force, and doctors around the nation and locally are questioning the findings.
The task force recommends against mammograms in women 40 to 49 years old without a history of breast cancer in their family and suggests that women 50 and older should have mammograms every two years instead of annually. The panel also says self breast exams provide little or no benefit.
These new guidelines go against what doctors have been telling women for the past 20 years.
Ward said if her patients had waited until age 50 to have a mammogram, they'd likely all be dead.
Marathon resident Charlotte Quinn is one of those women. She was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 41.
"I am appalled that this information has come out, because if it hadn't been for mammograms starting at age 40 for me, I wouldn't be here today," said Quinn, now 63, who battled the disease again in her early 60s.
Quinn's daughter was screened at age 40 and also was diagnosed with the disease.
"If she hadn't gotten hers when she turned 40, she wouldn't be here today either," Quinn said. "Putting it off until age 50 is a risk I am not willing to take and I wouldn't recommend to anyone."
Ward said she will continue to follow previous guidelines and urge patients to start mammograms at age 40 and continue self breast exams, which is the recommendation of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
The organization released its own statement Monday in response to the task force findings, saying it disagrees with the new suggestions and urges its members to continue screenings beginning at age 40 and teaching patients how to check their own breasts at home for irregularities.
Ward and her colleagues believe self breast exams are a critical tool for detecting cancer in its earliest stages.
"If you're not doing breast exams, then you're not going to find something early," she said. "And by the time I see you six months or a year later, it may be too late. Breast cancer these days is very treatable, especially if we catch it early."
Key West resident Leslie Concepcion felt a lump in her breast at age 39, shortly before her first scheduled mammogram. She was diagnosed with cancer and successfully underwent chemotherapy.
"I think it's terrible that this (new guideline) has come out," she said. "I think it lulls a lot of women into having this false sense of security. And the whole thing about breast cancer is early detection. That was key for me."
Because Concepcion caught her cancer early, she responded well to treatment and even went on to give birth to a son, now 6 years old.
"If I had waited to have a mammogram, God only knows what would have happened," she said. "We as women have to know our body. And doing these self-exams are the first step in really knowing and understanding our bodies."
Ward and Dr. Sandy Shultz, a radiologist at Lower Keys Medical Center, said cancers found in women younger than 50 often are more aggressive, which makes their early detection so important.
Shultz said many of the mammogram films he's analyzed of cancer patients in the Keys and as the head of a radiology clinic in Savannah, Ga., involved women under the age of 50.
"It's very common," he said. "The cancer that we see in the younger patients seems to be a much more aggressive cancer. So if you miss it, the chances of survival are diminished."
Shultz, a radiologist of 29 years, said when he was running the clinic in Georgia he fought strongly to get the screening age brought down to 40 because he believed it was so important.
"I'm not changing my opinion on this," he said.
The American Cancer Society's Florida Keys Unit will not change its guidelines to align with the task force's recommendations either, said the chapter's local medical adviser, Dr. Rose Chan, a general surgeon in Key West.
"There is no new evidence that would lead the American Cancer Society to change its guidance to women about mammography screening for breast cancer," she said. "We strongly urge women to continue to follow our guidelines."
Chan said the society has documented a noticeable decline in breast cancer deaths -- 29 percent since 1989 -- which it directly attributes to increased screening.
During the 1980s, about 13 percent of women were getting mammograms, and the size of the tumors detected averaged 3 centimeters, she said. By the late 1990s, 60 percent of women were getting mammograms, and the average tumor size had decreased to 2 centimeters.
Also during the 1990s, the number of breast cancer-related deaths for all women dropped 2 percent each year. For women under 50, the drop was even more significant, at 3 percent a year.
The task force's scientific analysis says that for women age 49 and younger, 1,904 women would have to have a mammogram to save one women's life. By comparison, for women 50 and over, 1,339 women would need to be screened to save one women's life, a difference of 565 women.
Chan said she does not agree with the group's justification that having an additional 600 women tested for the sake of saving one life is not important.
She acknowledged that mammograms have limitations, including false positives that lead women to undergo biopsies -- something the task force deems an unnecessary risk. But Chan said she believes most women would rather undergo a biopsy than risk not catching cancer early enough to be treated.
She also said she's seen plenty of patients who first discovered their breast cancer through self-exams, and feels strongly that women should continue to do them.
"It's not about feeling for a lump; it's about getting used to the way the breast feels," she said. "If it feels different, that is the time to bring it to your doctor's attention."
Both Chan and Ward said they are wary of how health insurance companies will use the task force data.
"One other concern coming out of this, which is important, is the implication that it allows the insurance companies to deny screening," Chan said. "It gives them room to deny people care. That's significant."
Ward agreed.
"I think insurance companies are going to use this as a reason not to cover mammograms in women who are under 50," she said, adding that it was "interesting that the timing occurs with the discussion of socialized medical care."
amswary@keysnews.com
Obama's Fault
Stop hating on Obama. Blame Jesus.
I am amazed
The people attempting to pass these bills are simply being paid off by the same people who helped to author the bills. These same groups of people are also the ones poised to make the most money off of your suffering and misery. The same way that the warhawks in the pentagon, KBR, and Xe (read: Blackwater) are making a killing *literally* in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan after starting and escalating a war for profit. Next stop: Iran and Venezuela.
Those of you who keep on screaming wake up and then bashing Obama on his puppet pedestal are simply falling right into line. The first step to fixing this country *legally and in a civilized manner, if thats even possible anymore considering some of these comments and others like them* is to correct and exactly define the meaning of the words 'person' and 'citizen' in the 14th amendment to disallow giant multi-billion dollar international corporations from lobbying congress, filing lawsuits against individuals, and assisting and participation in the process of making and passing laws.
The chains which originally bound corporations from these terrible activities have been broken, and while most of you sit around pointing the finger at one another and the puppet president, the people who really run the show are taking your money away from you legally, while inflicting massive damage to your personal livelihood and the overall welfare of the entire human race, not to mention environmentally destroying the planet. If you really want to make a change, petition your congress, participate in government, first arm yourself with knowledge and secondly make your voice heard. Break free of the left-right paradigm that the government and media attempt to confine you in. There is no 'conservative' or 'liberal' in government anymore. Only greed. Greed, greed, and more untethered, unrestrained greed. Reality is based upon perception, and the more you allow your mind to open, the more of reality you will perceive.
With Love
You are wrong.
YOU voted OBAMA in the WH-what does OBAMA stand for?
Breast Cancer at an early age
This is NOT Obama's fault or the fault of "liberals".
WHAT??!!
Gov't run healthcare....
Pass the Pipe
there's a bestselling book called "Arguing with Idiots"
Get a copy and have someone read it to you
Breast Caner
Soylent Green Healthcare
I hope there is a special place in hell for these bastards.
This story needs to be highlighted more. It is so outrageous and so clearly linked to govt. run healthcare and cost cutting schemes that will end up killing women.
I'm a man and I too agree
Shame on you for politicizing this important issue
You Kool-Aid Drinking Fool
Don't you dare pontificate about politicizing health care reform or "bashing" Obama, you damn fool. There's nothing disgraceful about self-preservation. Have you got that? What's more, the whole health care debate is 100% political and your feigned indignation is lost on me. You don't have any idea what's going to be covered or not covered under "health care reform" nor does anyone else because the bill has not been reconciled in the Senate. Do you know that or are you just ignoring that little inconvenient fact?
The government has no business involved in my health care and I am not going to listen to vacuous intellectual lightweights like you or roll over for your president, Pelosi, Reed and the rest of the disingenuous, self-serving pinheads who are leading this nation down the road to immeasurable misery and mediocrity.
We're talking about life and death issues here and I'm not going to meekly acquiesce. If you were a little bit brighter, you'd recognize that there are lot of people in this country who are not going simply smile and accept this crap.
I guess you have health insurance
You should read before you dare to "think" what will be covered
there's a book called Arguing with Idiots
Get a copy and have someone read it to you
Welcome to Rationing 101
If you want to rile up your liberal friends, explain to them that this new advice is the exact same thing Obama has been talking about when he explains that the Health Care reform bill will reduce costs by using scientific data comprised by “Health Care Advisory Panels”. Be sure to make this point to every single liberal NOW supporting female you know. Explain that these panels are the main cost saving types that Obama has been pushing for!
I got news for you...
Ferrari are rationed too
When will you buy me a Ferrari?
Seriously??? If this was
You Just Don't Get It Do You?
Have you read the House health care bill? With you working two jobs and a wife with a "great job", do you think you are going to get by for less than $8400 a year? I don't think so.
One of the first things your wife's employer is going to do is drop the coverage and force both of you onto a high-priced plan with mediocre coverage. You can get sick if you want, but you are going to pay for your health care coverage whether you actually use the benefits or not. The alternative is jail and maybe a fine.
The shallowness of the average American never ceases to amaze me. As George F. Will wrote recently, "If you think health care is expensive now, wait until it's free".
Gimmy Gimmy Gimmy - It's all Bush's Fault
If you could comprehend you would understand that they are going to limit access to preventative care to cut costs
This is an Obama appointed panel
Your husband works for the city and you are expected to pay for something yourself !!!!!
OH the HORROR !!!!
These are Obama appointees
Get your head out of the sand
Where is N.O.W. NOW?
Maybe Katie, Oprah and the scores of liberal women around the country will begin to see what an anti-human administration we have. Where is N.O.W. on this?
In the long term, marxist redistributionists can NEVER allow private medical care, it perpetuates the class system don’cha know.
Final Solution
None of the Congresscritters have said they will give up their CadillacCare and use the system they are forcing on the rest of us.
You can bet Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein, and the rest of the females in the Politburo will be getting regular mammorgrams. The rest of us peons will be lucky to get any medical care at all by design. MengeleCare/DeathCare is Pelosi’s final solution.
Congress members' insurance is NOT a "Cadillac" plan!!!
You're entitled to your own opinion but not to your own facts
Congress has a health plan which makes FEHB look like Kenya
Which is what the Kenyan is trying to move the rest of us toward
Wow
Agenda Item
I look for them to start putting out this kind of CRAP about other potential life-saving tests on a regular basis as well. Tell the lie often enough and folks will believe that it is NOT NECESSARY to have a mammogram or colonoscopy or whatever they’ve declared unnecessary for that week!
That will save the govt healthcare so much money if folks stop having these tests thinking that they are a waste of time and effort.
Wonder if the govt will go a step further and penalize those of us who continue to have mammograms and pay cash for them, since it won’t be FAIR to those who cannot and because we will be DISOBEYING their orders not to have one before age 50.
Dumbed Down Healthcare
I believe this is an attempt to dummy down healthcare cost and I believe more misinfo will follow . There’s a lot of behind the scenes social engineering going on these days .
Women and the elderly require the most health care and there’s where they intend to make the biggest cuts .
Alternate title:
How to Anger More Than Half the U.S. Population in 30 Words or Less
Just think of the money we could save if we started at 60!
This is what the protocol is in Britain. How many wmoen do you know who have been diagnosed with Breast CA before age 50??? I know several. RIP American Medicine.
PAP Smears Next?
Just wait, next they’ll say pap smears don’t need to be done until a woman is in her 40’s. Something like that is in place in the UK. Of course several visible stories about women in their 20’s-early 30’s dying, including one from a famous TV program.
Pathetic
Looks like the Mengele team wants the US to have the same survival rate for cancer elsewhere...in the name of ‘fairness’.
you can bet Pelosi Galore will have no lack of good medical treatment for herself or her minions..
Marxist Medicine
The timing is perfect. Just when the Obamacare supporters thought they were going to get "everything" for free, they find out there is a lot less of their blissful "everything."
This story flies in the face of Obama's asinine comments where doctors would rather amputate a foot for the extra money, than to prevent and treat diabetes.
Yup. They'll tax what 'they' don't think you need and will not
I was a long time Dem but I'm done. I didn't vote for Obama because he was shallow and had no clue about what his job would be. He thought lofty rhetoric would be enough. He's finding now that he's in over his head. AND now he has to pay back his Big Pharm and Medical contributors with his Obamacare plans.
Marxist Medical rationing
Too young for services, too old for treatment.
In the end, it depends what a 15% reduction in breast cancer mortality means to this society.
As an aside, I was fortunate to have a 70% five year survival prognosis following my cancer diagnosis, surgery, and internal radiation. Let me assure you that a 30% probability of dying from the diagnosis is a big number when you are on the receiving end of the odds.
Panel's computer was plugged in at a Holiday Inn last night.
This about the guidelines women often depend upon for their own health and safety and letting insurance companies off the hook. Any woman who has a genetic predisposition for cancer is doubly screwed under these guidelines.
Welcome to Zimbabwe.
Surely appears to be a trial balloon
I know 2 people who died in their early 40s from breast cancer, both had young kids so let's just say I question this study. I don't know if this has to do with oncoming 0bozo care but IMHO it does. If this is something to gear us up for socialized medicine, could Soetoro be any more politically tone deaf? Think about it, he's trying to ram this crap sandwich through by any means necessary. One of the big objections is decline in the quality of care and BANG, before it's even through the senate a study like this comes out.
This is either a major coincidence (which I don't believe) or the Soetoro administration are the biggest bunch of clowns since Ringling Bros. came to town.
What's Next?
Next it will be said that men need not get prostate cancer checkups until they reach 60 years of age. That way, when we do get prostate cancer, the screening will detect it and by then, it will be too late to do anything about it and off to the deathcamps we go.
It appears to me that Obama and his death squad are slowly getting us used to the way things will be under Obamacare.
Get Granny a Sweater for Christmas
The CDC Death Panel has decided that if you are over 64 years old, you are last in line to get the Swine Flu vaccine. Out on the ice floe with you...
Obamacare has not even passed, and we are already getting glimpses of how it will work. Imagine how it will be when the government has complete control.
What
ObamaCare Propaganda
I happened to see this study being touted last night and then again this morning on "Today". My very first thought was ObamaCare Propaganda. All of a sudden on the eve of ObamaCare a "study" is coming out claiming that less screening and less mammograms for women under 50 is actually more beneficial?
The "study" is not endorsed by the American Cancer Society and is being pushed by this U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Although I've read claims that this task force is a "nongovernmental" body, I am finding this is not the case. The task force is actually appointed and funded by the Government. Maybe I am being a bit conspiracy theorist here but this thing just reeks of propaganda to me....
The US Preventive Services Death Panel. It “prevents” services.
This is how they will ration care. They will just say that you are not allow to get screenings, then if they find anything you will die quickly. So, Sarah Palin was not wrong in proclaiming Obama “Death Panels”. This Obama commission report leaves the death panel handwriting on the wall for both women and men who will die because they were not tested early enough. Sad commentary for America and it’s politicians so desiring of playing God with the lives of other innocents!!!
How is that for Obama’s hope and change???
DO NO HARM
Another reason NOT to go into Medicine. The first rule in Medicine: DO NO HARM Why would anyone wish to practice medicine with both hands tied behind their back, and the prospect of retaliation if something goes awry? You will see moral physicians trying to offer good medicine in the shadows and alleyways of Americans underground...
So, chalk one up for Sarah. We already have death panels.
Orwellian “double think”
This may be the most blatant example of Orwellian “double think” yet. For years we’ve heard nothing other than “early detection” and earlier and more frequent testing.
Now, on a dime - the advice is absolutely reversed.
What’s next Obama eugenics?
Welcome to the future
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is a government controlled comparative-effectiveness research task force.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is comprised of internal medicine doctors, pediatricians, family practitioners as well as OB-GYNs and nurses. There are no surgeons or oncologists who deal directly with breast cancer or even radiologists involved in this task force .
Breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death among women
This may be the first big hint of what nationalized health care will do: sacrifice care standards -- and lives -- to save money.
A study compiling statistics from the American Cancer Society show that one out of every 229 women aged 30 will be diagnosed with cancer over the next 10 years, and the number increases drastically to one out of every 68 by age 40. That’s an increase of over 340%.
When the health of each individual American becomes a government controlled federal budget item, this is the sort of tortured logic that comes from a government task force whose directive is to cut the budget. Screenings for breast cancer are not worth the cost if they don’t save X number of lives according to some government bureaucrat notion of the value of a life.
And we are to believe this is pure serendipity???? ---- >>>>> Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid Set to Unveil Senate Health Care Bill Today
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is posed to unveil his version of government-run health care today to at least the Senate Democratic caucus this afternoon. Reid has voiced his desire for the bill to include the government takeover, which causes some Democrats re-election heartburn.
There are reportedly four Democrat senators who actually want to be able to read the bill and see the CBO cost analysis before voting to proceed.
Back Room Exams?
When breast examines are rationed, women will have their breasts examined by seedy characters in back rooms operating outside the law.
Maybe it’s time for me to consider a career change.
How selfish you are
It's time for people to concern themselves with what's good for the collective and leave these thoughts of individualism in the past. If the state is going to need you to die, go with it.
I'm only speaking for barry.
Mammograms give you a dose of radiation every year.