Florida Keys News - Key West Citizen
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Add to FacebookAdd to Twitter
Tourist claims lemur bit her on cheek
New street performer rules invalid on private property

A lemur used in a street exhibition in Old Town allegedly bit an unsuspecting tourist on May 20, raising issues of how wild and domesticated animals are being regulated in their use by street performers in Key West.

Cherish A. Giannetta, of Egg Harbor, N.J., claimed in an affidavit filed with the city's Code Compliance Department that after she held the animal about 10:45 p.m., "The lemur suddenly turned and bit me on one cheek ... then the lemur bit me harder on the cheek (again).

"I handed the lemur back and realized my left cheek was bleeding, so we left to go purchase first aid supplies and clean it," she wrote in the affidavit. "I didn't think about asking about diseases until it was too late, as I was so in shock that I had gotten bit."

Giannetta filed the affidavit five days later, on May 25. Code Compliance Manager Jim Young on Tuesday said he was not aware of any pending legal action connected to the incident.

In a video of the incident recorded by Giannetta's husband, a copy of which the city gave The Citizen, Giannetta is holding the lemur, which turns toward her, but no blood can be seen on her cheek.

The affidavit claims the owner, Kurt Tomecek, a Stock Island resident, said to her, "That was why I told you not to say anything." In the video, Tomecek, who is holding the leash attached to the lemur, is not heard making that statement verbatim, but instead says, "Stop. See what I mean? He might think you're trying to take food from him. That's why I was, like, be quiet with him."

The lemur clearly seems to bite at Giannetta's nose -- the bridge of her nose, specifically, not her cheek, as stated in the affidavit. Just before the lemur nips at Giannetta, Tomecek clearly tells her that he discourages anyone from making "clicking" or "kissing" noises, as the animal can possibly mistake those sounds as cues for another meaning or interpretation, making the animal unpredictable.

"It was a love nibble on her cheek," Tomecek told The Citizen Tuesday. "There was no blood or discoloration on the woman, no broken skin. She paid $20 to have her picture taken with the animal, and she understood that it's an animal."

Tomecek said the lemur, known as "Batman," has nails on its hands, which are more dangerous than its teeth. Batman, barely a year old, has been raised entirely in captivity.

Stricter regulations

Tomecek will be issued a citation because he didn't have an occupational license to operate on private property, according to Young. The incident occurred on private property in the 700 block of Duval Street.

Tomecek has a public street performer permit, but the rules regulating such activities apply only to acts occurring on public property, not private property, Young emphasized.

The city in April increased regulations for street performers and artists on public property. The only animals that legally can be used are dogs, cats, birds and tortoises, and performers are required to have at least $300,000 of liability insurance.

"This is exactly why city staff was stressing the need for insurance during the discussions (for this ordinance)," Young said Tuesday.

The city gave performers until June 8 to acquire the appropriate insurance policies, Young said, so Tomecek was not required to have such insurance at the time of the incident, even if he had been on public property.

Tomecek has 150 days to obtain a $100 occupational license to operate on private property. He also will be fined $25 for the violation, and could be charged another $250 in administrative fees to cover the cost of the investigation, according to Young.

Legal vs. moral

Key West has a long and colorful history of street performers using exotic animals in their acts. Still some people oppose the practice, even if animal owners comply with state and federal regulations.

The U.S. Animal Welfare Act of 1966 states: "During public exhibition, any animal must be handled so there is minimal risk of harm to the animal and to the public, with sufficient distance and/or barriers between the animal and the general viewing public so as to assure safety of animals and the public."

That's not enough, according to the international animal advocacy group Born Free USA.

"The public may not be aware that when they patronize, or pay, these exhibitors for their 'services,' they are contributing to animal cruelty," Monica Engebretson, a senior program associate with Born Free USA, said via telephone from her office in Sacramento, Calif.

Born Free's mission is to end the suffering of wild animals in captivity, rescue individual animals in need and protect wildlife, including endangered species.

"Even if the animal appears to be in good health and appears to be treated well during the exhibition, there is no way for the casual observer to know the conditions under which the animal is kept or how the animal is treated when not on display," she continued. "Moreover, captive wild animals are constantly denied the ability to express their natural behaviors and this is a constant source of stress. Stressed and frustrated animals are always unpredictable and can lash out or 'snap' without warning."

She said animals can physically injure humans and pose health risks from diseases that can be transmitted between humans and animals.

lneuhaus@keysnews.com

Share your thoughts and opinions related to this posting. Login or register to post comments. More Info

Isn't It ILLEGAL to Own a Lemur In Florida?

I ignored this article but finally read it. I agree it does not look like she was hurt. HOWEVER, I believe owning a Lemur is illegal in Florida or at minimum requires licensing and bonding. Using the Lemur for commercial purposes also requires a federal license. The Citizen or Code Enforcement should check into this and let us know. I would bet this guy has not followed the law. Lemurs do NOT make good pets. They are wild animals. They are also endangered. They will bite, though generally not to the point of serious injury. Using this wild animal in this way has got to be illegal in Florida. Owning primates is banned in most states or requires licensing, bonding, approvals, etc.

What's Next?

Lions and Tigers and Bears? Gone are the days of just the drunks who have mastered the art of making you a clipper ship out of Budweiser cans. Or the guy who tells dirty jokes at night and spends the day gallivanting half naked around Astro City in his Lord of The Apes loincloth... and nothing else. Now, let's break out a rock n' roll falcon or how about an orangutan that can make mojitos. What the Hell is going on down there?!

There is so much wrong with this scenario.

First, the animal shouldn't be made to perform on the street with the rest of the dirtbags out there, panhandling. And let's face it, that's what they're doing when they charge you $20 to take a picture with their animal. The animal deserves quality of life, so if it's not in it's natural habitat, it should at least have a comfortable, private home away from strangers.

Secondly, the guy clearly is trying to skirt the law. All the complaining by these buskers about the $300,000 liability insurance is just another move to deny responsibility for their own actions. Every VIABLE business has liability insurance. These people should have it to and it's not expensive either. They are trying to get around the cost of doing business - which is in most cases, licensing, bricks and mortar, insurance, utilities, etc. It's not a REAL business if you're just a glorified beggar.

Third, just look at the quality of these 'performers'. And what happened to the guy with the dog, who was arrested for other crimes?

Finally, what person in their right mind would pay $20 to have a picture taken with a wild animal on their shoulder? I have parrots and I can tell you, anyone who walks around with a parrot on their shoulder at any time, and especially in public with traffic, people and distractions, has no clue about the natural behavior of the animal. If it's on your shoulder or above your eye level, the animal now feels dominant and that's when people get hurt. Those who walk around with parrots on their shoulders (or in their ratty hair on motorcycles) are really just exhibiting a pathetic need for attention.

Visitors like to make adieu about nothing..,

The video of Cherish A. Giannettadoes doesn't not show any skin being broken; I even looked at the video with a strong glass magnifier and there is no bleeding or Hematoma (bruising); all the time she was smiling. She didn't act shocked and starttled and upset on film plus she waited 5 days to report a so called "incident"? You know she is up to something and it smells like cow chips (to put it mildly). My sister has a 5 year old main coon cat. The cat likes to scrape her mouth with teeth along your hand, that is her way of giving love nips, but my 4 year old neice thought the cat was biting her. I had to explain to her that the cat isn't bitting, that is the cat's way of showing affection. The cat doesn't have a mean bone in her body. Cherish A. Giannetta was told not to make any kissy noises or clicking (that includes unusual noises/sounds people make in public), even a chuckle or gutteral lagh/chuckle That is misread by the Leamur as a threat to steal food from him or a challenge. My Daughter was working at Sippin cafe when Kurt and Batman came in; The lemur took to my Daughter and jumped on her shoulder and just basked in the attention, She never made any clicking or smacking/kiss noise she only talked in a soft lite voice so the lemur wound't get starttled. Lemurs don't like loud booming noises, loud talking it scares them and hurts their ears (hearing is sensitive), clicking, gutteral laughs, and lip smacking/kissy noises are misinturpet and the lemur isn't sure how to react so he'll give a nip as a warning or hide for protection. Kurt didn't do anything wrong and Batman surely didn't bite that lady. Cherish A. Giannetta was surprised when the lemur gave a little nibble. There is a big difference between a nibble, a nip and a bite. Nibble, you can feel the teeth but no skin has been puncutred or (Hematoma)bruising, A nip is a warning and there is no broken skin nor outward bleeding very little Hematoma (bruising), A bite is when the skin has been broken and Hematoma sets in (bruising) with blood oozing out and under the skin. Mrs. Giannetta can't fake it either and then cry wolf, because animals teeth and Knines are different in diamiter, length, sharpness and/or dullness.

I agree but

I agree this woman is a lawsuit liar. I also 100% agree that the lemur meant no harm, that said...It changes nothing. The animal should not be used as it is. If you "love yout lemur" keep it away from drunks and at home!

So according to you Lemurs

So according to you Lemurs have sensitive ears and do not like loud noise. Have you ever been to Duval Street? Between motorcycles, scooters, bar music, music blaring out of shops, people yelling "$5.00 EVERYTHING!", and crowds, I guess this poor animal is in pain all day long. Maybe you should called Animal Cruelty. You can't have it both ways.

Bite, nip, nibble....

no matter how you define the act, it poses danger and possible harm. Obviously, this animal felt some sense or level of threat to its safety. There is no way you can convince me that the lemur was displaying affection to a complete stranger. The creature deserves to live in a natural habitat or as nature intended; in the wild. BTW: "starttled" should be s-t-a-r-t-l-e-d; "leamur" l-e-m-u-r; "puncutred" p-u-n-c-t-u-r-e-d; "knines" c-a-n-i-n-e-s; "diamiter" d-i-a-m-e-t-e-r, Lastly, it's ado (as in 'fuss') not adieu (as in 'farewell'). Thank heavens you practiced spelling "Hematoma"!

My cat nibbles all the time. It's her way of showing affection &

My cat nibbles all the time. It's her way of showing affection & 'ownership'. It's an animal thing. She's also a hair-chewer, heaven knows what THAT means. But she's been with me for 18 years and it's just what she does. Some might say she's biting, but she's not....far from it. My other cat is a 'face petter'. She pets my face constantly with her paw, then gives me kissies. It's just what SHE does. People who do not understand animals should not be around them. While I think the guy shouldn't be out there unlicensed, the woman seems to be going for the 'bucks' somehow. She didn't cry out. She didn't appear hurt or alarmed. And Cherish? I mean, really? CHERISH? (And Faye, just fyi, it's ado, not adieu. Shakespeare had it right. You don't.)

snide

that last comment was snide and uncalled for. Adieu is a correct FRENCH word for goodbye, and yes, ado should have been used but really Tina...why call poor Faye out on something so minor? BTW- where you may find it loving and endearing, allowing your cat to "pet your face"- who's paws are constantly in dirt and clay with fecal matter, is not wise. Cat scratch fever is real- not just a song, and can make you very ill.(I love my cats too, but would never allow their paws near my face.)

Huh? It's snide to expect someone to make sense?

Huh? It's snide to expect someone to make sense? Of course it's French and a real word. Duh. I didn't say that she misspelled it. If one uses words incorrectly and makes no sense, it invalidates any prefectly valid response that person might make. If no one tells Faye that she is using the English language (or French words) improperly, she'll continue to abuse it and make HERSELF look bad. For your information, while adieu is indeed French for 'goodbye', it is not a valid subsitution for the proper word, ado. According to Merriam Webster, Ado is defined as ado noun \ə-ˈdü\ Definition of ADO 1: heightened fuss or concern : to-do 2: time-wasting bother over trivial details . So the title makes no sense. As for your cat issues, I'm sure your cats can't even get close to your face because of your girth. My cats are not in clay nor dirt nor fecal matter. Cats are fastidious. My cats' paws are going to be clearly cleaner than your hands or the hands of your grubby kids. You need to learn a bit about feline grooming. I've had cats for 40 years and never been sick from one of them.

Common sense would (should)

indicate that this young animal innately carries instincts that will never be lost. Being raised in captivity does not ensure that the lemur would ever be a wise choice for entertainment and handling purposes. When the handler has to 'warn' others how to behave in the presence of the animal--it's clearly a sign of trouble for all involved.

Wild animals....DO NOT belong on Duval Street

These animals....given a choice....wouldn't be on display....on Duval Street, being groped and prodded by tourists, in a loud, totally foreign environment to them. They...would be at HOME....in the wild....where they belong. They're PRISONERS. They have no life whatsoever. The ONLY reason that they aren't there....is so that someone...can make a fast buck. EVERYTHING about it....IS WRONG.

Wild animals are on Duval

They're from out of town and ride scooters drunk, urinate on the street, get in fights, ride personal water craft with reckless abandon and don't tip very well. Then they're the ones who are shirtless just to show off their ridiculous tats. I could go on but I've got to go to the zoo.

One step further - they show their tats and their FATS.

Saw a fat old guy last week, walking down the street with no shirt, and too-tight, almost-transparent swim trunks. Even though the trunks were too tight, he somehow managed to show us all a lot of his flabby butt-crack. And he had a bag from a t-shirt shop, from Margaritaville, and from Sloppy's in his hand. Wish he'd taken out one of those shirts and put it on before he ruined my lunch!

Hey now!

That was the grand marshal of this year's FatFest!;-)

he he he Good one!

You're cracking me up, Mac!!! What's up with that? (Get it - CRACK?)

This is performance art?

Taking a potentially dangerous animal and sticking in tourist's faces is performance art? A felon telling dirty jokes is performance art? What is wrong with this city? I support true street performers. Painters, mimes, singers, etc. However, as with all things in this tacky town, we scrap the bottom of the gutter to come up with our offerings. This type of activity should be illegal. A tourist will sue The City for allowing something like this, that is potentially very dangerous, to be licensed. It is time to get these people off our streets. An animal like this could do serious damage to someone. I do have to say how stupid is a tourist that pays $20 to get a photo like this? $5, maybe, but $20??? I would like to see this Kurt Tomecek's last tax return? Maybe the IRS would be interested in the hundreds and hundreds in cash this guy must make every day. What did you declare last year Kurt? Do you collect food stamps as well?
More Florida Keys Headlines
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Available Only in the Electronic Edition