Florida Keys News - Islamorada/KL Free Press
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Add to FacebookAdd to Twitter
Sheriff asks judge to throw out ex-deputy's suit

The Monroe County Sheriff's Office has asked a judge to rule meritless a year-old lawsuit in which an ex-deputy alleges he was battered by superior officers and then fired after reporting the matter to state investigators.

Gerald Fletcher Jr., who was fired from the Sheriff's Office in March 2011, says Capt. Don Hiller of the internal affairs unit and Lt. Donnie Elomina, a former internal affairs investigator, held him against his will after an interview gone bad in November 2010.

Also named in the suit are Sheriff Bob Peryam and Undersheriff Rick Ramsay, who Fletcher says violated the federal whistleblower statute by retaliating against him after he brought his complaints against the internal affairs officers to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

No criminal charges have been filed against Hiller or Elomina. And in May, U.S. District Court Judge Jose Martinez threw out four other civil and policeman's rights counts brought by Fletcher in his lawsuit.

If the judge grants the Sheriff's Office's request for what is known legally as a summary judgment, the whistleblower act, battery and false imprisonment counts would be closed ahead of a full trial.

Neither Fletcher attorney Michael Davey nor Sheriff's Office attorney Luke Savage returned Free Press calls for this article. But court filings, depositions and investigative records lay out the positions of both parties.

The dispute arose from a Nov. 24 meeting, when Hiller and Elomina questioned Fletcher about his failure to produce a recording for an internal affairs investigation on which he had agreed to assist.

All parties acknowledge that the interview grew contentious, and eventually Fletcher stood up from his chair. That's where the accounts diverge.

In Fletcher's version, Hiller responded by cursing at him and ordering him to sit down.

"Fletcher attempted to leave the room, but was physically accosted," his lawsuit alleges. "During the struggle, plaintiff Fletcher was struck severely on the face, causing bruising around the eye."

Subsequently, Fletcher says, he left the room, but Elomina then took him by the arm into an interview room. Elomina stripped Fletcher of his duty belt, including his radio and phone, Fletcher said, and ordered him to stay there while Hiller went to speak with Ramsay. Fletcher says he was forced to remain in the room for approximately 30 minutes.

Placing Fletcher in the room under threat not to leave amounted to confinement without due process, Davey wrote in support of the false imprisonment count he brought in the suit.

Hiller and Elomina, however, say that when Fletcher stood up during his meeting with them, he moved toward Hiller in a threatening manner. In response, Hiller put his hands on Fletcher's shoulder and ordered him to sit, but Fletcher persisted in his direction.

"He was actually resisting and he came forward again, and I pushed again and I actually kind of pushed away," Hiller said in a Sept. 5 deposition in which he offered no recollection of striking Fletcher on the face.

Elomina said in his deposition that he led Fletcher by the arm into the interview room and took the deputy's duty belt. But he said he didn't take Fletcher's phone, which the deputy had already left in the meeting room.

Fletcher was in the interview room for only five minutes before Hiller returned and told him to go back to his work station at the Stock Island Detention Center, according to Hiller and Elomina.

On his way to the jailhouse, Fletcher encountered Ramsay and told him what had happened, but Ramsay responded that the Sheriff's Office did not have a mechanism to deal in-house with a complaint against the head of internal affairs, Ramsay said in his deposition.

Fletcher instead took his complaint to the FDLE, then headed locally by Vince Weiner.

The FDLE conducted its investigation over the course of a month, then took the finding to Assistant State Attorney Manny Madruga, who decided not to bring charges. Madruga did not respond to phone calls last week for an explanation of his decision.

In the suit, Fletcher's attorney made a point of calling Weiner, who resigned from the FDLE in May after pleading guilty to a petit theft charge, a friend of Ramsay.

The Sheriff's Office sparked controversy when it hired Weiner as a road deputy soon after his guilty plea and resignation from the state police.

"I think he is remorseful for his actions and has stepped up to the plate to take responsibility for it," Ramsay said at the time.

While the FDLE was conducting its investigation into Hiller and Elomina, the Sheriff's Office began its own internal affairs review of Fletcher's actions during the events in question.

The office also opened three other internal affairs investigations into Fletcher between December 2010 and February 2011. It ultimately sustained all 12 charges in the four cases, including charges of insubordination, perjury and lack of compliance with a superior's lawful order.

Peryam fired Fletcher on March 7, 2011.

In the lawsuit, Davey contends that the real reason Fletcher was fired was because he filed a complaint with the FDLE.

"In terminating plaintiff Fletcher, defendants MCSO and Sheriff Peryam violated the Whiste-blowers's Act," the suit says.

Sheriff's Office attorney Savage disagrees.

"The decision to terminate plaintiff's employment was made for entirely legitimate, non-retaliatory reasons," he wrote in last month's motion for summary judgment.

rsilk@keysnews.com

Share your thoughts and opinions related to this posting. Login or register to post comments. More Info

A Little Legal Lesson for Government Employees

I don't know about this court action, but I read lots of civil rights cases and many involve federal and local employment and free speech issues. Therein lies the rub. If you complain about personal issues, that is not protected speech. If you complain about something that is of public interest or in the public interest, then your free speech is protected, and you can't be fired because of it. If you are fired, you can sue and get damages, etc. If you just complain about something affecting you, that is not protected free speech. You don't qualify as a whistleblower either. The case law on this is very clear. In addition you can't sue any government official for not conducting an investigation or any similar complaints. In addition to all the above, the governmental entity is in the clear if it gives the person a modicrum of due process and the opportunity to confront the charges. If the governmental employee is given adequate due process, then there is no case either usually. These are some general prinicples in this very tricky area of federal law.

ok

First we see Ramsay blatantly lie about his employment disciplinary file which was published on nakekedconch.com now we find he has subjected our taxpayer dollars to a lawsuit to protect his buddies? Where is the State Attorney? Why is Assistant State Attorney Manny Madruga covering for his buddy Ramsay. I guess the Ramsay signs, all over Madruga truck parked at the state atty office say it all. The arrogance Ramsay displays is legendary. It appears he thinks he can do anything he wants without repercussions. I don't believe that a lawsuit would still be in pending all this time if it had no merit. The only question left is how much is Ramsay and his band of thugs going to cost the county this time?

Let me get this straight

Undersheriff Ramsay, candidate for Sheriff, says his best friend since high school, Capt Hiller and his buddy, did nothing wrong. Both of whom are very active in Ramsay's campaign, driving county vehicles to campaign events, soliciting business and community members to vote for Ramsay while in uniform. Then FDLE investigates and presents results to the state attorney who decline to charge. Vince Wiener head of FDLE at the time, resigns after criminal charges and is quickly hired by Ramsay. Manny Madruga, long time friend and huge Ramsay supporter declines to charge anyone. It appears to me it pays to be Ramsay's friend. But watch out if you cross him in this county. Is this the kind of people we want to run our sheriffs office? Pay attention to the bubba system antics during this election and vote to remove these jackbooted thugs in November. If we don't we all better start kissing Ramsay's butt, keep our heads down for the next four years. Remember you will be on Ricks list if he is elected and you supported or allowed the other candidate to place a sign at your business or home.

Florida Statute 112.532

The above statute requires: The formal interrogation of a law enforcement officer or correctional officer, including all recess periods, must be recorded on audio tape, or otherwise preserved in such a manner as to allow a transcript to be prepared, and there shall be no unrecorded questions or statements.

Has anyone asked for a copy of the audio and/or videotape of the interrogation? It seems that would clear up this he said / they said matter. If there are no audio or video tapes ...... then Florida Statute 112.534 Failure to comply; official misconduct applies. Since it is quite lengthy I will leave it for the reader and reporter to review themselves.

Re Ramsay's statement that there is no mechanism to review a complaint against an internal affairs investigator is bogus. (is it possible he has lied again?) Per MCSO general orders, the general orders apply to everyone and there is a process spelled out in the general orders on how the investigations will be conducted and who will conduct the investigation. So in this case it appears to this humble reader that Ramsay is protecting a friend, nothing more , nothing less.

Oh did you know that Elomina was promoted to lieutenant shortly after his incident? Hmmmmmm.......

More Florida Keys Headlines
Friday, May 24, 2013
3 comments
Thursday, May 23, 2013
2 comments
Thursday, May 23, 2013
15 comments
Available Only in the Electronic Edition