


A Monroe County deputy who is the subject of an Internal Affairs investigation following the theft of weapons and other law enforcement equipment from his vehicle -- for the second time in three years -- was fired from the Key West Police Department 14 years ago after accumulating a personnel file full of complaints, according to city and county officials.
City of Key West r...
I agree with your sentiment that we need to support our deputies. That does not mean we have too blindly accept the decisions that are made by the command staff at the MCSO. I am questioning why they made the decision to hire an admitted liar, his testimony under oath is worth less than spit. If the SAO, Public Defender and private defense attorneys did not know it before they know it now and the defense bar will use it to their advantage. At every trial from now on this deputy will be asked under oath if he has ever been disciplined for lying. Quite possibly all convictions where this deputy was the arresting officer will now be vacated if it can be proven that the SAO knew he was a liar and failed to disclose it to the defense lawyers. This deputy's immature behavior(your words)has far greater implications in the field of law enforcement than you realize.
Any objective reader would not equate repeated violating established policies at the KWPD and MCSO with being absent minded, especially when youy prior actions were the reason for the aforementioned policy. I call it incompetent and exercising extremely poor judgement. These are not the attributes that patrol deputies look for in their supervisors and neither will I and neither should the MCSO command staff. That is my way of supporting the MCSO deputies.
Regarding your question about MCSO putting gun locks and safes into their cars. Why should they? They have a policy that clearly spells out the NO firearms or LEO marked clothing and equipment is to be left in the squad cars over night. Hence no need for locks.
To the command staff of MCSO, We the voters are watching. If you think you can take all the 180 days to complete this investigation and put it off until after the election, you are wrong. I for one will interpret that as your inability to do what is required. In my opinion and that of most of my family and neighbors, this deputy has demonstrated by his prior conduct that he cannot be trusted with either a gun or the truth.
Based on the private conversations I have had with MCSO line deputies I doubt there will be any swift action taken in this matter. So please join me in supporting all MCSO deputies and employees for voting for Tom Peteck on November 6th. That is the only way we have left to return the sheriff's office to the prestige it had under the leadership of the finest sheriff I have ever had the pleasure to work for...Sheriff Billy Freeman.
Nice song and dance Sheriff, but how hard is it to say yes the policy change was brought about by the first Fricke theft. As is common in law enforcement after a major mishap, especially one that was not covered in policy, it is unofficially given the last name of the reason for the new policy. Hence the name "the Fricke policy". Now some may be wondering why it was not in policy before, in defense of the Sheriff, simply put the authors of the previous policy believed it to be common sense and not necessary. In other words those that write policy are experienced law enforcement officers but those who read the policy are not and in some cases do not possess even the smallest amount of common sense.
If I had been the reporter and the Sheriff told me the policy change was not brought about by the theft of dangerous weapons from a squad car. I would have had two questions, first why was it not previously in the policy and second why it was not addressed sooner after the thefts of dangerous weapons from a squad car.