Florida Keys News - Key West Citizen
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Add to FacebookAdd to Twitter
New schools grading system

No more zeroes -- at the end of the grading period, anyway.

That's the upshot of the School District's new Student Progression Plan (SPP), which was passed by the School Board at Tuesday night's monthly meeting.

The plan, which was unanimously approved, numbers dozens of pages, but the major changes affecting grading and grade advancement are fairly simple, according to District Director of Accountability and Assessment Christina McPherson.

"The highlighted changes specifically include a new Virtual Education policy and Academically Challenging Curriculum to Enhance Learning (ACCEL) policy, as now required by Florida statute," said McPherson, among 19 people, including principals, assistant principals and guidance counselors from Key West to Key Largo charged with compiling the plan. The SPP is updated annually to align with new state legislative requirements.

To see the whole plan, click on http://www.keysschools.com/schoolBoard/agenda_folders/12-13_Agenda_Folde..., scroll to the bottom, and click on Approve Student Progression Plan.

"The ACCEL policy sets forth guidelines for student acceleration in grades kindergarten through 12," McPherson said. "Additional graduation requirements were updated to include End of Course assessments in algebra, biology, geometry and U.S. history, depending on a student's entry into the ninth grade. Students who entered grade nine during the 2011-12 school year and beyond are also required to complete one online course for graduation."

Of particular interest to students and their parents, the numeric grades at the end of the quarter, or nine-week grading period, will default to a 50, as the lowest "F" possible, for the end of the marking period only. Previously, no default was applied.

"The default only applies to the end of nine weeks grade," McPherson stressed. "Several schools in the district had already implemented this as a school-based policy. It was included in the SPP to provide consistency throughout the county."

Pupils may still receive zeros in the grade book on assignments, quizzes, tests, projects, etc., she added.

"Students will continue to be challenged with more rigorous expectations as the state shifts from the FCAT and transitions to the new PARCC assessments."

Prior to Tuesday's meeting, board Chairman Andy Griffiths called for "a philosophical debate" about the plan.

"It's not appropriate to use a zero on a 100-point scale as the floor," Griffiths said. "It would be appropriate on a 4-point scale. But you can't tell me a kid knows zero. That would be like a punishment. It's not an evaluation of what he or she knows."

tschmida@keysnews.com

Share your thoughts and opinions related to this posting. Login or register to post comments. More Info

If you average 90 and three

If you average 90 and three fifties you still have passing. So students only have to go to school for nine weeks? In the real world if you sleep at your job, do not show up, and do not do the work required of you, they do not give you half pay, they fire you, and you get zero pay. This is just another way of falsifying data to keep out A rating, like not processing bullying referrals and promoting students who have not earned the credit. On paper great, in reality a complete travesty.

Mixing apples and oranges

At 59 points, a student fails (loses their job in your analogy). When you fail a class, you get zero credit. When you lose your job, you get zero pay. In school, you don't get 59 percent of the credit and at work, you don't get 59 percent of your pay. But you are confusing pay scales with grading scales.

A minimum grade of 50 still equals sero credit. There are also other restrictions which prevent a student who doesn't show up from passing.

Finally, Monroe County didn't make up this approach, they are just catching up with the real world.

Sounds nice, but

I want my daughter to earn her grade. If she doesn't do an assignment or is not in class, I don't want her to get 50% credit. I think there is a reason why you get 3 strikes in baseball which means you are out. I think this policy sends a terrible message to our children about mediocrity. Mr. Griffiths says that no child knows zero, but how did they come up with the 50%? Did they grab this number out of thin air? Seems like they did. I think it all comes back to good parenting. I make sure my daughter does her homework and is in school every day and stays out of trouble. Those kids who aren't there, who don't do homework, and don't put forth effort? They most likely have parents who are failing in their responsibility of parents. This grading policy lowers standards, to push the kids along, so they can pass the child on to the next grade. One more thing, the article says that administrators and counselors developed this policy. I am on SAC and nobody mentioned this to us or asked us about it. I sure would have like to give input on this.

This is the problem with the current generation of students and

even the generation ahead of them. They were never allowed to FAIL. They give trophies to the LOSING teams in school sports. Mom and Dad tell them they're wonderful even if they have done something wrong. It sends the wrong message, creates entitlement attitudes, and sets up unrealistic expectations for life.

This program just continues with the same. What do we get? A bunch of zero's who think they're 50% ers.

Agree. All KWHS graduates who have applied for a job

with me are clearly zero's who were told they're fabulous. None were hired.

The grading scale...

A = 90 - 100; B = 80 - 89; C = 70 - 79; D = 60 - 69; Therefore, for the purposes of mathematical averaging, an F should be equal to 50 - 59.

Likewise, G.P.A. is based on an A receiving four points, three points for a B, two points for a C, one point for a D, and zero points for an F. If every assignment was converted to its G.P.A. corresponding grade, a similar result would be realized as with the proposal.

Arguing that a missed assignment should receive zero means that the average grade for two perfect papers and a missed paper would be 67 points, or a "D". A grade is supposed to be an assessment, not a punishment.

Eliminate ALL Zeroes

Any mathematical assessment of grading reveals that zero is an inappropriate grade for any assignment, even one that wasn't turned in, because it gives disproportionate weight to the single grade.

Imagine the average of two grades, one of which is the highest possible "A" or 100. The other is a missed assignment. If "zero" is recorded, the average of the two grades is still 50, or "F"

How can the average of an "F" and an "A" be an "F"?

Let's Just Give Them All "A's"

Here's the difference, based on your scenario: Old System: Test 1 = 100, Test 2 = 0. Average = 50. New System: Test 1 = 100, Test 2 = 50. Average = 75. So instead of failing a class with a 50 under the old system, a kid will now get a "C". So the kid will now get a C instead of an F. Social promotion at its finest.

Point System

It can't. They could also use the "old" system of assigning each grade a point system. A=4, B=3, C=3, D=2, etc. Then the "average" would be a C which would make more sense. This is something they used to do in the past. I don't understan this constant need to change the grading system. What's wrong with the old standard of 90-100 = A, 80-89 = B, etc. If it isn't broke...

B=C?

That must be a really "old" system, if a person got the same number of points for a "B" as for a "C."

Typo

Sorry it was a typo. Heaven forbid someone should make a mistake. I meant for it to say C=2. Happy now? Geez.

How about grading the

How about grading the parents?

Correction

I guess I should also correct the "D" before I get called out again. A=4; B=3; C=2; D=1; F=0 THERE! That's what I orginally meant to say. :)

Nowhere to click...

"Like"

Available Only in the Electronic Edition
Sunday, May 26, 2013 -
Saturday, May 25, 2013 -
Friday, May 24, 2013 -
Thursday, May 23, 2013 -
Wednesday, May 22, 2013 -