The more you know about this subject, the more confusing this story becomes. Different samples are compared against one another to create a rosy picture, yet the data that is required to make an informed decision is lacking.

Algebra I is generally considered a 9th grade course. The article conflates populations to create erroneous conclusions. For example we are told that the exam was passed by 100 percent of 7th graders who took the 9th grade test. Mind you, these are gifted children who are taking a course that is two years ahead of the standard track. Did you ever know of a gifted kid who flunked a test?

On the other hand, we learn that 10th graders who took the 9th grade exam, scored very poorly. We are not told how many 7th graders passed, or how many 10 graders failed, we are only given percentages. It's impossible to draw a conclusion.

Schools are then evaluated, based on the percentage of students who obtained passing scores. We learn that Horace O'Bryant scored a high passing percentage. But, every student at HOB who takes Algebra I is either in the "Gifted Program" or is taking a class above the normal middle school curriculum.

The KW Citizen needs to stop cherry-picking data to lead readers to false conclusions. The Chinese Menu approach of one from column A, one from column B, and one from column C, leaves everyone in the dark.

Speaking as an educator, NO school district should ever settle for a 70% passing rate. They are leaving 30% of their students behind. Not impressive.